2020 CRO QUALITY BENCHMARKING RATINGS

A FACT-BASED APPROACH TO YOUR

CRO PROVIDER SELECTION

Which CRO is the best to conduct a given trial? Who will perform the best?

Industry Standard Research asked biopharma and pharmaceutical executives from North America, Europe and Asia to rate 40+ Phase I-III CRO providers on staff, delivery, budget, loyalty and more.

Get The Executive Summary

Fill out the brief form to take a fact-based approach to choosing your clinical development partner with the 2020 ISR Reports.

WORLDWIDE IS THE ONLY CRO RATED A TOP PERFORMER
FOR STAFF, DELIVERY, BUDGET AND LOYALTY ACROSS
PHASE I-III CRO SERVICES

STAFF CHARACTERISTICS

  • Project manager quality
  • Responsiveness
  • Staff turnover
  • Study design expertise
  • Therapeutic expertise
  • Timely project communications

DELIVERY FACTORS

  • Data quality
  • Easy to work with
  • Local market/regulatory knowledge
  • Meeting overall project timelines
  • Operational excellence
  • Patient/volunteer recruitment
  • Technology for real-time access to data

BUDGET FACTORS

  • Appropriateness of change orders
  • Cost

LOYALTY METRICS

  • Likelihood to recommend
  • Likelihood to use again
  • Overall satisfaction

CUSTOMER FEEDBACK

Source: Industry Standard Research, 2020. CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase I Service Providers (12th Edition), CRO Quality Benchmarking – Phase II/III Service Providers (12th Edition)

RATING METHODOLOGY

As rated by customers for Phase I-III CRO services Respondents were required to pass several screening criteria to qualify and participate in this survey:

  • Must work at a pharmaceutical company, biotech company, or medical device company
  • Must have responsibility in at least one of several relevant areas such as Clinical Operations, Project Management, Executive Management, or Research and Development Management
  • Must have involvement with outsourced Phase I-III trials within past 12 months